BIG NEWS: Alex Jones is finally banned from Twitter. Want to help us expose other extremists just like him? Become a CARD-carrying member of the newsletter by making a tax-deductible contribution right now? You can make a one time or recurring donation. Every bit helps!
Become a CARD-carrying member: Support Ctrl Alt-Right Delete’s 2019 fundraising drive today!
By Melissa Ryan
This week the Senate Intelligence Committee (AKA the adults in the room, the ones who treat Russian interference seriously) held what is likely their final hearing on foreign election interference before the midterm elections. Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg and Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey testified before the committee about what the tech companies have done/are doing to protect Americans from foreign influence operations in 2018 and beyond.
As is always the case with Senate Intel hearings we learned a lot, at least a lot about what Facebook and Twitter are doing because Google opted not to send their CEO and was represented by an empty chair. You can read my full recap of the hearing including a report card of previously raised concerns/questions from the committee that Sandberg and Dorsey addressed as well as questions still outstanding, over at Media Matters.
Unfortunately If you read any political news news about the hearing it was probably about this moment — which happened outside in the hallway between Alex Jones and Senator Marco Rubio.
I was following (and live-tweeting) the hearing so I actually didn’t see this exchange until hours later. But I wasn’t surprised by it. As I wrote earlier in the week previewing the hearing while Republicans on the Intelligence Committee tend to approach their work in a bipartisan manner, Republicans in general are more interested in riling up their base around the mythical social media censorship issue. In an impressive feat of counterprogramming, the Republican-led House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on “Twitter’s algorithms and content monitoring,” also with Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey, on the same day!
Republicans are riling up their base around the mythical social media censorship issue.
Far-right personalities were in DC and on hand to do everything they could to derail the hearing, support the GOP’s “conservative bias” narrative, and keep the media’s focus away from foreign interference. As Daily Beast Reporter Will Sommer noted in addition to Jones Chuck Johnson, Laura Loomer was also in DC for the hearings. It was inevitable that one of them would pull a stunt.
When I finally watched the Rubio/Jones exchange hours later, I found myself relating to Rubio, even feeling bad for him. In the video he’s trying to keep the focus on foreign interference, attempting to deflect questions on social media censorship from a reporter, and then he’s forced to fend off Alex Jones who is coming at him with every ounce of crazy Jones can muster. Which is how I’ve felt for the past couple of years, trying to understand all of this while also having to fend off the shitshow that inevitably comes along with it.
Rubio and I don’t agree on anything politically but he’s always been one to watch on the Intelligence Committee. His own Presidential campaign was targeted by Russian operatives with both cyber attacks and most likely an online smear campaign. My suspicion is because of that Rubio understands the implications of continued foreign interference better than many of his colleagues. Whereas most Republicans dismiss concern about Russian interference as anti-Trump hysteria, Rubio knows firsthand how it feels when Russian operatives are targeting you. Which is probably why he was trying to get the reporter he was speaking to to focus on foreign interference rather than the GOP’s “conservative bias” obsession or Alex Jones.
Jones’ stunt clearly worked. Within minutes both Rubio and Jones were trending on Twitter and much of the coverage of the hearing focused on the exchange in the hallway. Rubio told reporters after the incident “I know you’ve got to cover them, but you give these guys way too much attention. We’re making crazy people superstars. So, we going to get crazier people.” Again, and I can’t believe I’m saying this twice in one post, I see where Rubio is coming from. His comments were like a shorter version of Data and Society’s The Oxygen of Amplification.
Twitter, has finally decided they’ve given Jones enough oxygen and banned both him and Infowars permanently from the platform late on Thursday afternoon. Officially the reason is that Alex Jones harassed reporter Oliver Darcy via his periscope account, but I have to wonder if the fact that Jones went after Dorsey in a similar way on the same day (with less success) was a factor.
Coming back to actual hearing, what happens next? Committee Chair Burr and Vice Chair Warner generally close these hearings by previewing what the committee plans to do next and what reports or followup we can expect. That didn’t happen this time. We have no indication that any further unclassified reports or recommendations will be forthcoming. Given that the election is almost two months away, that’s unsettling. But the reality is that with the current makeup in Congress (and the executive branch), the government isn’t going to do anything else. Providing oversight to our intelligence entities, pressuring tech companies in public hearings, and producing reports — that’s about as much as the Senate Intelligence Committee can do right now.
Hopefully, the next Congress makes protecting Americans from foreign influence operations and cyber attacks more of a priority.
By Sofia Patel
In many ways, right-wing extremism in Australia reflects trends in Europe and the US. As in European nations, Australia is experiencing a growing anti-Islam, anti-immigrant sentiment, along with a clear nationalist and white protectionist agenda. In other ways, Australia is different. For example, there remains a latent prejudice against the Asian and Indigenous communities. The overtly fascist group Antipodean Resistance employed a campaign against Chinese students at the University of Melbourne last year, which indicates that elements of the Australian far right remain preoccupied with traditional targets alongside those who are focused on a new common enemy.
Australia has not yet experienced the same levels of coordination and mobilisation across extreme right-wing groups as in Europe or the US. However, it would be prudent to identify where the fault lines are in order to pre-empt the groups’ evolution. For example, a movement is growing in Australia, fronted by groups and individuals who campaign against what they perceive as the threat of Islamic culture, that are comparable to anti-Muslim groups such as Pegida or the ‘identitarian’ youth movement Generation Identity which are active in Europe and organisations like ACT! for America in the US.
For the next two Sundays I’ll be participating in a series of webinars organized by Justin Hendrix from March for Truth. Join one of these webinars to learn what you can do to recognize and defend against information warfare and social media interference. Admission is free and details are below.
What You Can Do To Defend Your Community
Sundays, September 16th and 23rd – register below!
Space is limited- register today:
Register for Sunday September 16th at 8 pm Eastern
Register for Sunday, September 23rd at 8 pm Eastern
I’m quoted in this Wall Street Journal article about Facebook and why extreme political ads do so well on the platform. The article isn’t behind the paywall which is nice.
The meme from this week’s article was created by Libby Shaw and used with permission.
Obligatory reminder that our 2019 fundraising drive is still ongoing. Support your favorite resource for all things online extremism by becoming a member today.
Become a CARD-carrying member: Support Ctrl Alt-Right Delete’s 2019 fundraising drive today!
With so much discussion about Reform UK’s success at the general election, there has been a flurry of articles written about the party and Nigel…
